Review Process Policy

This journal implements a rigorous and objective peer-review process to ensure the scientific quality of every manuscript published.

1. Review Method

• Double-Blind Peer Review: The identities of the authors and reviewers remain concealed from each other to maintain the independence and objectivity of the evaluation process.

2. Peer Review Process Workflow

1. Initial Editorial Screening: The editor assesses the manuscript's suitability for the journal's focus and scope, compliance with formatting requirements, and plagiarism screening using Turnitin.
2. Peer Review: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript's substantive quality, research methodology, feasibility, and originality.
3. Editorial Decision:
   • Accepted: The manuscript is accepted for publication without revisions.
   • Revisions Required: The manuscript requires revisions before it can be considered for acceptance.
   • Resubmit for Review: The manuscript requires revisions and must be resubmitted for further review.
   • Resubmit Elsewhere: The manuscript may be submitted to another journal that is more relevant to its subject matter for publication consideration.
   • Decline Submission: The manuscript is rejected because it does not meet the journal's scientific standards.
4. Author Revisions: Authors must revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers' comments and recommendations within the specified deadline.