PENGUATAN KAPASITAS PETERNAK AYAM BROILER MELALUI INTEGRASI SMART BIOSECURITY DAN STANDARDISASI PROBIOTIK BAKTERI ASAM LAKTAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51158/1vzr8516Keywords:
ayam broiler, bakteri asam laktat, biosekuriti, pemberdayaan peternak, smart farmingAbstract
Kelompok peternak ayam broiler masih menghadapi kendala dalam penerapan biosekuriti yang terstandar, pemantauan kondisi lingkungan kandang, serta penggunaan probiotik bakteri asam laktat (BAL) yang belum konsisten. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan meningkatkan kapasitas kelompok peternak melalui integrasi smart biosecurity berbasis sensor dan standardisasi penggunaan probiotik BAL. Kegiatan dilaksanakan dengan pendekatan pemberdayaan partisipatif melalui lima tahapan, yaitu identifikasi kondisi awal, sosialisasi dan edukasi, implementasi smart biosecurity, standardisasi probiotik BAL, serta monitoring dan evaluasi. Implementasi smart biosecurity dilakukan melalui pemanfaatan sensor untuk memantau suhu, kelembapan, dan kualitas udara kandang, yang dipadukan dengan penyusunan dan penerapan prosedur operasional biosekuriti. Standardisasi probiotik dilakukan melalui penetapan jenis, dosis, volume air minum, waktu, metode pencampuran, dan frekuensi pemberian. Evaluasi dilakukan melalui pre-test dan post-test, observasi praktik, pemantauan penggunaan perangkat, serta pencatatan kegiatan dan performa produksi. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa skor pengetahuan peternak meningkat dari 67% pada pre-test menjadi 80% pada post-test, atau meningkat sebesar 13%. Kemampuan operasional peternak dalam menggunakan perangkat monitoring dan menerapkan prosedur pemberian probiotik juga meningkat berdasarkan hasil checklist observasi dari 75% menjadi 85%. Program menghasilkan penerapan format pencatatan kegiatan pemeliharaan yang lebih terstruktur pada kelompok mitra. Integrasi teknologi sederhana dan standardisasi prosedur memberikan dasar bagi penerapan manajemen pemeliharaan yang lebih terukur; keberlanjutan penerapan perlu dipantau pada periode pemeliharaan berikutnya.
Abstract
Broiler chicken farmers continue to face challenges in implementing standardized biosecurity practices, monitoring poultry house environmental conditions, and maintaining consistent use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) probiotics. This community engagement program aimed to strengthen farmers' capacity through the integration of sensor-based smart biosecurity systems and the standardization of LAB probiotic administration. The program employed a participatory empowerment approach consisting of five stages: baseline assessment, socialization and education, smart biosecurity implementation, LAB probiotic standardization, and monitoring and evaluation. Smart biosecurity was implemented using sensors to monitor poultry house temperature, humidity, and air quality, combined with the development and application of standard operating procedures for biosecurity. Probiotic administration was standardized by specifying probiotic types, dosages, drinking water volumes, administration schedules, mixing methods, and application frequencies. Program evaluation involved pre-tests and post-tests, practical observations, monitoring of device utilization, and documentation of farming activities and production performance. The results showed that farmers' knowledge scores increased from 67% in the pre-test to 80% in the post-test, representing an improvement of 13 percentage points. Farmers' operational competencies in using monitoring devices and implementing probiotic administration procedures also improved, with observation checklist scores increasing from 75% to 85%. Furthermore, the program facilitated the adoption of a more structured record-keeping system for poultry management activities among participating farmers. The integration of accessible technologies and standardized procedures provides a foundation for more systematic and measurable poultry farm management. However, the sustainability of these practices requires further monitoring across subsequent production cycles.
Downloads
References
Anggriawan, Candra, D. A., Kumalasari, D. A., & Hanna. (2025). Performa Produksi Dan Kelayakan Usaha Peternakan Ayam Pedaging Yang Ditambahkan Probiotik Bakteri Asam Laktat. Jurnal Ilmiah Fillia Cendekia, 10(2), 75-81.
Anggriawan, R., & Candra, D. A. (2025). Pengaruh Pemberian Probiotik Em4 Terhadap Pertumbuhan Berat Badan Dan Fcr Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Agriovet, 8(1), 18-30.
Anggriawan, R., Candra, D. A., Lestari, N. A., Amam, A., Prastiya, R. A., & Akmal, Y. (2026). Ideal Protein Concept in broiler chicken nutrition: Advances in essential amino acid profiling, modeling approaches, and sustainable feed formulation: Ideal Protein Concept in broiler chicken nutrition. Letters In Animal Biology, 6(1), 67-75.
Anggriawan, R., Lokapirnasari, W. P., Hidanah, S., Al Arif, M. A., & Candra, D. A. (2024). The role of probiotics as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in enhancing poultry performance. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 12(4), 610-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2024/12..4.610.620
Anggriawan, R., Lokapirnasari, W. P., Hidanah, S., Al Arif, M. A., and Candra, D. A. (2024b). Residue detection of tylosin antibiotics and enrofloxacin in broiler chickens. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 12:2195-2204. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.11.2195.2204
Anggriawan, R., Lokapirnasari, W. P., Hidanah, S., Al-Arif, M. A., & Candra, D. A. (2024a). Performance of broiler chickens in open house cages with additional probiotic nutrition. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 12(9), 1630–1639. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.9.1630.1639
Anggriawan, R., Lokapirnasari, W. P., Hidanah, S., Al-Arif, M. A., & Candra, D. A. (2024). Performance of broiler chickens in open house cages with additional probiotic nutrition. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci, 12(9), 1630-1639.Azarpajouh, S., Weimer, S. L., Calderón Díaz, J. A., & Taheri, H. (2022). Smart farming: A review of animal-based measuring technologies for broiler welfare assessment. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2022, Article 033. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews202217033
Banjoko, I. K., Shuaib, O. M., & Raji, A. K. (2025). Smart sensors and AI-based precision livestock management: a case study on broiler and noiler poultry farming. International Journal of Bioscience and Agrological Research.
Candra, D. A., & Anggriawan, R. (2024). Analisa bisnis peternakan ayam pedaging dengan sistem kandang tertutup pada “CV. Anugerah” di Kabupaten Kediri. Jurnal Agriovet, 6(2), 21-30.
Candra, D. A., Anggriawan, R., Hana, C., & Fajri, M. L. N. (2026). Phytogenic–probiotic supplementation enhances growth and economic efficiency in commercial closed-house broiler production systems: Phytogenic–probiotic supplementation in broiler chicken. Letters In Animal Biology, 6(2), 79-88.
Chotiah, S., & Damayanti, R. (2018). Characterization of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic candidate to overcome the salmonellosis in broiler. Buletin Plasma Nutfah, 24(2), 89-96.
Fathurohman, M. A. A., Sumitra, I. D., & Daud, A. R. (2023, December). Integration of wireless sensor network and IoT for enhanced broiler closed-house monitoring: A case study at broiler teaching farm. In 2023 9th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Hana, C., Kumalasari, D. A., & Anggriawan, R. (2021). Pelatihan Strategi Pemasaran Online bagi UMKM Bawang Goreng di Kecamatan Grogol. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 35–41.
Harisah, F. N., Mulyati, S., & Siregar, H. (2025). Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Biaya Produksi Terhadap Profitabilitas Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler: Studi Kasus Farm Broiler Batam. Measurement Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(2), 281-290.
Kamaruddin, S. F., Leunupun, E. G., & Kriswantini, D. (2023). Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan Berdasarkan SAK EMKM Pada Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Di Desa Wakarleli. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10(10), 4841-4846.
Kamau, C. N., Majiwa, E. B., Otieno, G. O., & Kabuage, L. W. (2024). A double-hurdle model estimation of adoption and intensity of use of poultry production technologies in Machakos County, Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 10(1), 2338435.
Karmelia, A., Rahma, A., Sinaga, H. Z., & Ramadhani, A. N. (2024). Optimizing broiler chicken farm production using Internet of Things smart farm to reduce food loss and waste. Manager: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 7(3), 1-15.
Nalendra, A. K., & Waspada, H. P. (2025). Smart poultry farming: A mobile-based IoT system for real-time broiler monitoring and management. International Journal of Electronics and Communications Systems, 5(1), 81-91.
Olejnik, K., Popiela, E., & Opaliński, S. (2022). Emerging precision management methods in poultry sector. Agriculture, 12(5), 718.
Preethi, C., Haripriya, K., Hammed, S. S., Pavalarajan, S., Srinithi, R., & Dharshini, R. (2025, August). Smart Poultry Farming: IoT-based Automation for Temperature, Humidity, and Water Regulation. In 2025 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS) (pp. 837-843). IEEE.
Silmi, M. G., Anggriawan, R., & Candra, D. A. (2025). PENGARUH PEMBERIAN PROBIOTIK EM4 TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN BERAT BADAN DAN FCR AYAM BROILER. Jurnal Agriovet, 8(1), 18-30.Tilli, G., Laconi, A., Galuppo, F., Grilli, G., Żbikowski, A., Amalraj, A., & Piccirillo, A. (2024). Supporting measures to improve biosecurity within Italian Poultry Production. Animals, 14(12), 1734.
Xaba, M., Nontu, Y., & Jiba, P. (2026). ICT adoption in smallholder poultry farming: a systematic review of benefits, barriers, and gender disparities across Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 18(4), 1788.
